4.6 Review

Cerebral microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes: stroke, cognitive dysfunction, and depression

期刊

LANCET DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 8, 期 4, 页码 325-336

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30405-X

关键词

-

资金

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research [916.19.074]
  2. Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development
  3. Dutch Heart Foundation [2018T025]
  4. L'institut Servier
  5. Intramural Research Program (National Institute on Aging, US National Institutes of Health)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adults with type 2 diabetes are at an increased risk of developing certain brain or mental disorders, including stroke, dementia, and depression. Although these disorders are not usually considered classic microvascular complications of diabetes, evidence is growing that microvascular dysfunction is one of the key underlying mechanisms. Microvascular dysfunction is a widespread phenomenon in people with diabetes, including effects on the brain. Cerebral microvascular dysfunction is also apparent in adults with prediabetes, suggesting that cerebral microvascular disease processes start before the onset of diabetes. The microvasculature is involved in the regulation of many cerebral processes that when impaired predispose to lacunar and haemorrhagic stroke, cognitive dysfunction, and depression. Main drivers of diabetes-related cerebral microvascular dysfunction are hyperglycaemia, obesity and insulin resistance, and hypertension. Increasing amounts of data from observational studies suggest that diabetes-related microvascular dysfunction is associated with a higher risk of stroke, cognitive dysfunction, and depression. Cerebral outcomes in diabetes might be itnproved following treatments targeting the pathways through which diabetes damages the microcirculation. These treatments might include drugs that reduce dicarbonyl compounds, augment cerebral insulin signalling, or imnprove blood-brain barrier permeability and cerebral vasoreactivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据