4.7 Article

Highly efficient cycloaddition of diluted and waste CO2 into cyclic carbonates catalyzed by porous ionic copolymers

期刊

JOURNAL OF CO2 UTILIZATION
卷 36, 期 -, 页码 169-176

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcou.2019.11.003

关键词

Porous ionic copolymer; Cycloaddition; Diluted CO2; Cyclic carbonate

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundations of China [21566011, 31570560]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province [20192ACBL20025]
  3. Jiangxi Province Sponsored Programs for Distinguished Young Scholars [20162BCB23026]
  4. Science & Technology Programs of Jiangxi Province Department of Education [GJJ160272]
  5. Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Coal Combustion [FSKLCCA1809]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is believed that porous heterogeneous materials with excellent properties are promising candidates for efficient fixation of diluted and waste CO2. Herein, a family of mesoporous porous ionic copolymers (PIPs) was designed and prepared from the copolymerization of divinylbenzene (DVB) with vinyl-functionalized ionic liquids monomers through free radical copolymerization process. It was demonstrated that the heterogeneous PIP poly(divinylbenzene-l-allyl-tetramethylguanidinium bromide) PDVB-[AlTMG]Br-0.2 showed excellent activities in facile cycloaddition of CO2 into cyclic carbonates without using any external co-catalysts or metal additives. The results of characterizations and quantum mechanical calculations further showed that the specic hierarchical meso-macroporous structure of PDVB-[AlTMG]Br-0.2 offered the strongest binding interaction with SO and besides had a relatively good CO2 affinity, which results to the best cataltic activity for cycloaddition of CO2. Moreover, PDVB-[AlTM]Br-0.2 exhibited high activities and good reusability in cycloaddition of 15 % diluted CO2 with various epoxides. It is believed that our work would have a great potential in energy-effective fixation of industrial combustion CO2 into high-value organic carbonates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据