4.6 Article

Alternative Splicing Events as Indicators for the Prognosis of Uveal Melanoma

期刊

GENES
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/genes11020227

关键词

uveal melanoma; alternative splicing; Lasso; survival analysis

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC1106000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Growing evidence has revealed that abnormal alternative splicing (AS) events are closely related to carcinogenic processes. However, the comprehensive study on the prognostic value of splicing events involved in uveal melanoma (UM) is still lacking. Therefore, splicing data of 80 UM patients were obtained from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) SpliceSeq and RNA sequence data of UM and patient clinical features were downloaded from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database to identify survival related splicing events in UM. As a result, a total of 37996 AS events of 17911 genes in UM were detected, among which 5299 AS events of 3529 genes were significantly associated with UM patients' survival. Functional enrichment analysis revealed that this survival related splicing genes are corelated with mRNA catabolic process and ribosome pathway. Based on survival related splicing events, seven types of prognostic markers and the final overall prognostic signature could independently predict the overall survival of UM patients. Finally, an 11 spliced gene was identified in the final signature. On the basis of these 11 genes, we constructed a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier and evaluated it with leave-one-out cross-validation. The results showed that the 11 genes could determine short- and long-term survival with a predicted accuracy of 97.5%. Besides, the splicing factors and alternative splicing events correlation network was constructed to serve as therapeutic targets for UM treatment. Thus, our study depicts a comprehensive landscape of alternative splicing events in the prognosis of UM. The correlation network and associated pathways would provide additional potential targets for therapy and prognosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据