4.3 Article

New insights on single-stranded versus double-stranded DNA library preparation for ancient DNA

期刊

BIOTECHNIQUES
卷 59, 期 6, 页码 368-371

出版社

BIOTECHNIQUES OFFICE
DOI: 10.2144/000114364

关键词

ancient DNA; paleogenomics; DNA library preparation; next-generation sequencing

资金

  1. Lundbeck Foundation [R52-A5062]
  2. Danish Council for Independent Research [10-081390]
  3. Danish National Research Foundation [DNRF94]
  4. Marie Curie Actions FP7 People [290344]
  5. Marie Curie Actions Intra-European Fellowship [FP7-PEOPLE-2011-IEF-298820]
  6. [FP7-IEF-328024]
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences [1640788] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Division Of Environmental Biology [1640788] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An innovative single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) library preparation method has sparked great interest among ancient DNA (aDNA) researchers, especially after reports of endogenous DNA content increases >20-fold in some samples. To investigate the behavior of this method, we generated ssDNA and conventional double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) libraries from 23 ancient and historic plant and animal specimens. We found ssDNA library preparation substantially increased endogenous content when dsDNA libraries contained <3% endogenous DNA, but this enrichment is less pronounced when dsDNA preparations successfully recover short endogenous DNA fragments (mean size < 70 bp). Our findings can help researchers determine when to utilize the time-and resource-intensive ssDNA library preparation method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据