4.7 Review

Efficacy and Safety of Sodium Tanshinone IIA Sulfonate Injection on Hypertensive Nephropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01542

关键词

sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate injection; hypertensive nephropathy; systematic review; meta-analysis; efficacy; safety

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81573909]
  2. Youth Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20181095]
  3. Social Development Key Programs of Science and Technology Commission Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BE2015730]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate (STS) injection, the extractive of traditional Chinese medicine Danshen, is supposed to be a supplementary treatment in hypertensive nephropathy. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of STS in treatment of hypertensive nephropathy. Methods: We systematically searched China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Scientific Journals Database (VIP), Wan-fang database, Chinese Biomedicine Database (CBM), PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from their inception to December 2018. All studies were screened by two reviewers according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria independently. The Cochrane Collaboration's risk tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Reviewer Manager 5.3 was employed for statistical analysis. Results: Sixteen trials involving 1,696 patients were included. The meta-analysis results indicated a combination of STS and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) was more effective than ARB monotherapy in modulating hypertensive nephropathy, as represented by improved estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) [mean difference (MD) = 6.87, 95% CI (4.47, 9.28), P < 0.00001] and reduced 24 h urinary protein [MD = -0.23, 95% CI (-0.27, -0.19), P < 0.00001], serum creatinine (SCr) [MD = -21.74, 95% CI (-24.11, -19.38), P < 0.00001], cystatin-C [MD = -0.16, 95% CI (-0.24, -0.07), P = 0.0003], urinary immunoglobulin G (IgG) [MD = -0.85, 95% CI (-1.11, -0.59), P < 0.00001], and urinary transferrin [MD = -0.61, 95% CI (-1.04, -0.17), P = 0.007]. In addition, the combination therapy had better control in systolic blood pressure (SBP) [MD = -6.53, 95% CI (-8.19, -4.87), P < 0.00001] and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) [MD = -4.14, 95% CI (-5.69, -2.59), P < 0.00001]. Only three trials reported adverse events, and no adverse drug reactions were observed. Conclusions: STS combined with ARBs had a stronger effect on improving renal function in patients with primary hypertensive nephropathy than ARB monotherapy. The combination therapy also provided auxiliary hypotensive effects. Further large-scale, multicenter, and rigorously designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) should be conducted to confirm our findings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据