4.6 Article

On-Chip TaOx-Based Non-volatile Resistive Memory for in vitro Neurointerfaces

期刊

FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00094

关键词

neural tissue; in vitro neurointerfaces; high-density microelectrode arrays; non-volatile memory; resistive switching; tantalum oxide; 1T-1R device; back-end-of-line process

资金

  1. National Technology Initiative Program Artificial Intelligence (Russia)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of highly integrated electrophysiological devices working in direct contact with living neuron tissue opens new exciting prospects in the fields of neurophysiology and medicine, but imposes tight requirements on the power dissipated by electronics. On-chip preprocessing of neuronal signals can substantially decrease the power dissipated by external data interfaces, and the addition of embedded non-volatile memory would significantly improve the performance of a co-processor in real-time processing of the incoming information stream from the neuron tissue. Here, we evaluate the parameters of TaOx-based resistive switching (RS) memory devices produced by magnetron sputtering technique and integrated with the 180-nm CMOS field-effect transistors as possible candidates for on-chip memory in the hybrid neurointerface under development. The electrical parameters of the optimized one-transistor-one-resistor (1T-1R) devices, such as the switching voltage (approx. +/- 1 V), uniformity of the R-off/R-on ratio (similar to 10), read/write speed (<40 ns), and the number of the writing cycles (up to 10(10)), are satisfactory. The energy values for writing and reading out a bit similar to 30 and similar to 0.1 pJ, respectively, are also suitable for the desired in vitro neurointerfaces, but are still far too high once the prospective in vivo applications are considered. Challenges arising in the course of the prospective fabrication of the proposed TaOx-based RS devices in the back-end-of-line process are identified.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据