4.5 Article

Graphene-Modified Mesoporous Iron Phosphate as Superior Binary Sulfur Host for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries

期刊

ENERGY TECHNOLOGY
卷 8, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ente.201901462

关键词

electrochemical performances; graphene frameworks; lithium-sulfur batteries; mesoporous FePO4; sulfur hosts

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51604089, 51874110]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [JJ20180042]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M601431, 2018T110308]
  4. Heilongjiang Province Postdoctoral Science Foundation [LBH-Z16056, LBH-TZ1707]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium-sulfur batteries (LSB) are considered to have great research value and application prospects in the future due to their high theoretical energy density, inexpensive characteristics, and environmental friendliness. However, the poor electronic conductivity, large volume change, and shuttle effect of the sulfur cathode seriously hinder the commercial application of LSBs. Herein, a graphene-modified mesoporous amorphous FePO4 (G/FP) binary host is synthesized using a mild one-step hydrothermal method. The FePO4 (FP) component with strong polarity plays a crucial role in chemical adsorption and conversion of polysulfides, thus inhibiting the shuttle effect during the cycle process. The graphene (G) framework ensures the electronic conductivity and physically adsorbs polysulfides to improve the utilization of active sulfur. The reasonable porous structure of the G/FP matrix guarantees fast Li+ transport and more electrochemical reactive sites, thereby enabling the excellent electrochemical performance of the G/FP/S cathode. The prepared G/FP/S cathode with a high initial discharge specific capacity of 1469.5 mAh g(-1) delivers a stable capacity of 840.7 mAh g(-1) at 0.2 C after 300 cycles and 656.7 mAh g(-1) at 1.0 C after 800 cycles as well as an excellent rate performance (651.8 mAh g(-1) at 5.0 C) at a relatively large sulfur loading of 3.1 mg cm(-2).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据