4.5 Article

Hierarchical Porous Carbon Anode Materials Derived from Rice Husks with High Capacity and Long Cycling Stability for Sodium-Ion Batteries

期刊

CHEMELECTROCHEM
卷 7, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/celc.201901826

关键词

biomass waste; carbonization; anode; porous carbon; sodium-ion battery

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51874151]
  2. Scientific Research Foundation for universities from Education Bureau of Jiangxi Province [GJJ170510]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province [20151BBE50106]
  4. Jiangxi University of Science and Technology [NSFJ2014-G13, Jxxjbs12005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Compared with the cathode materials, the research on the anode materials of the sodium-ion batteries has lagged behind. Therefore, development of the anode materials with high capacity, long life, and excellent rate properties is the key to unlocking the practical application for sodium-ion batteries. This study presents the preparation of hierarchical porous hard carbon as an active anode material from rice husks. The as-synthesized materials are characterized by X-ray diffraction, N-2 adsorption, Raman spectra, scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. These porous hard carbon materials exhibit a high specific surface area and are promising for reversible sodium storage. Galvanostatic studies show that the specific initial capacities of all samples were in the range of 130-300 mA h g(-1) at a current density of 100 mA g(-1) between 0.01 V and 2.3 V. Compared to the other samples, the hard carbon materials prepared at 800 degrees C from rice husk (RHPC-800) can deliver a high reversible capacity of 274 mA h g(-1) at a current density of 25 mA g(-1), maintain a capacity of approximately 260 mA h g(-1), and retain 92.7 % of its capacity after 500 cycles. This excellent electrochemical performance of the as-prepared RHPC-800 material is attributed to the high specific surface area and low charge transfer resistance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据