4.5 Article

Applying Educational Data Mining to Explore Students' Learning Patterns in the Flipped Learning Approach for Coding Education

期刊

SYMMETRY-BASEL
卷 12, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/sym12020213

关键词

blended learning; learning behaviors; learning performance; machine learning; online programming course

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan [MOST106-2511-S-038-009-, MOST108-2511-H-019-002, MOST108-2511-H-019-003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

From traditional face-to-face courses, asynchronous distance learning, synchronous live learning, to even blended learning approaches, the learning approach can be more learner-centralized, enabling students to learn anytime and anywhere. In this study, we applied educational data mining to explore the learning behaviors in data generated by students in a blended learning course. The experimental data were collected from two classes of Python programming related courses for first-year students in a university in northern Taiwan. During the semester, high-risk learners could be predicted accurately by data generated from the blended educational environment. The f1-score of the random forest model was 0.83, which was higher than the f1-score of logistic regression and decision tree. The model built in this study could be extrapolated to other courses to predict students' learning performance, where the F1-score was 0.77. Furthermore, we used machine learning and symmetry-based learning algorithms to explore learning behaviors. By using the hierarchical clustering heat map, this study could define the students' learning patterns including the positive interactive group, stable learning group, positive teaching material group, and negative learning group. These groups also corresponded with the student conscious questionnaire. With the results of this research, teachers can use the mid-term forecasting system to find high-risk groups during the semester and remedy their learning behaviors in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据