4.6 Article

Mixed-Method Research to Foster Energy Efficiency Investments by Small Private Landlords in Germany

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su12051702

关键词

energy renovation; small private landlord; mixed-method; problem-centred interview; OLS regression; rental market; Germany; governance; building

资金

  1. Ministerium fur Kultur undWissenschaft des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen - Ministerium fur Kultur undWissenschaft des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The decarbonisation of the building stock is an important element for the success of the German Energiewende (energy transition). Despite some progress having been made, the rate of energy renovation falls below the level required to meet political commitments. This gives rise to the question: what deters property owners from making energy efficiency investments and how can the policy framework foster such investments? To answer this question, the paper focuses on a widely neglected property owner group: small private landlords (SPL). Although they manage 37% of all residential rental properties in Germany, very little is known about their decision-making processes for energy efficiency investments. We applied a mixed-method design to identify factors that hindered and supported their investments. In an explorative study, we initially conducted 18 problem-centred interviews. Subsequently, we carried out a postal survey and analysed the questionnaires using a hierarchical linear regression model. The results show that energy renovation is a multi-dimensional decision-making process, which can only be adequately addressed by a comprehensive policy package. To develop such a package, the author recommends that the specific investment behaviour of SPL must be better targeted, their knowledge about energy efficiency investments must be improved through exchange and networking, a sense of responsibility for the neighbourhood must be fostered, and greater focus must be placed on improving local framework conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据