4.6 Article

Long-Term Impact of China's Returning Farmland to Forest Program on Rural Economic Development

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su12041492

关键词

returning farmland to forest program; payment for ecosystem service; regional economic development; instrumental variable; difference-in-differences methods

资金

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M641397]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71902196]
  3. Doctoral Start-Up Fund of the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [2018A030310287]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Returning Farmland to Forest Program (RFFP) is widely known as one of China's largest and most successful payment schemes for ecosystem service projects for the achievement of both environmental and economic sustainability. By sponsoring afforestation activities and compensating farmers for converting cropland to forest, the project was designed to achieve multiple goals. Ecologically, the program aims to expand forest cover and to reduce flood and soil erosion. Economically, it aims to alleviate poverty and improve rural livelihoods. Although the official metrics indicate successful program outcomes in the short term, researchers have reported mixed and controversial results for long-term outcomes. We combined the difference-in-difference (DID) with instrumental variables (IVs) regression to examine the long-term effects of China's RFFP on local economic development. We found that (1) the RFFP has had a remarkably positive impact on local economic growth in the primary sector, but considerably limits the growth of enterprises above a designated size by 16.8%; (2) the RFFP is unable to promote the development of the secondary industry because it cannot effectively promote the transfer of rural laborers to the secondary industry sector; and (3) in addition to increasing the general budgetary expenditure of local finance by 7.50%, this program has significantly reduced local fiscal revenue by 35.50%. We suggest that eco-compensation should consider the performance of the RFFP in its evaluation criteria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据