4.6 Article

Automatic Load Frequency Control of a Multi-Area Dynamic Interconnected Power System Using a Hybrid PSO-GSA-Tuned PID Controller

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 11, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su11246908

关键词

automatic load frequency control (ALFC); proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller; two-area interconnected power system (TAIPS); particle swarm optimized-gravitational search algorithm (PSO-GSA)

资金

  1. [9630000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a new population-based hybrid particle swarm optimized-gravitational search algorithm (PSO-GSA) for tuning the parameters of the proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller of a two-area interconnected dynamic power system with the presence of nonlinearities such as generator rate constraints (GRC) and governor dead-band (GDB). The tuning of controller parameters such as K-p, K-i, and K-d are obtained by minimizing the objective function formulated using the steady-state performance indices like Integral absolute error (IAE) of tie-line power and frequency deviation of interconnected system. To test the robustness of the propounded controller, the system is studied with system uncertainties, such as change in load demand, synchronizing power coefficient and inertia constant. The two-area interconnected power system (TAIPS) is modeled and simulated using Matlab/Simulink. The results exhibit that the steady-state and transient performance indices such as IAE, settling time, and control effort are impressively enhanced by an amount of 87.65%, 15.39%, and 91.17% in area-1 and 86.46%, 41.35%, and 91.04% in area-2, respectively, by the proposed method compared to other techniques presented. The minimum control effort of PSO-GSA-tuned PID controller depicts the robust performance of the controller compared to other non-meta-heuristic and meta-heuristic methods presented. The proffered method is also validated using the hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) real-time digital simulation to study the effectiveness of the controller.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据