4.5 Article

Comparative evaluation of different carrier-based multi-strain bacterial formulations to mitigate the salt stress in wheat

期刊

SAUDI JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 27, 期 3, 页码 777-787

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.12.034

关键词

Bacterial consortia; Carrier material; PGPR; Rhizosphere; Salinity stress; Survival; Wheat

类别

资金

  1. King Saud University through College of Food and Agriculture Sciences Research Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The application of liquid bacterial consortia to soil under natural conditions may fail due to various environmental constraints. In this study, the suitability and efficiency of compost, biogas slurry, crushed corn cob, and zeolite as carriers to support the survival of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and improve the performance of multi-strain bacterial consortia to mitigate the effects of salinity stress on wheat under pot conditions were evaluated. The survival of strains of Pseudomonas putida, Serratia ficaria, and Pseudomonas fluorescens labelled with gusA was evaluated for up to 90 days. Seeds coated with different carrier-based formulations of multi-strain consortia were sown in pots at three different salinity levels (1.53, 10, and 15 dS m(-1)). Results showed that salinity stress significantly reduced wheat growth, yield, gas exchange, and ionic and biochemical parameter values, but the 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carbox ylate (ACC) deaminase-containing multi-strain consortium used mitigated the inhibitory effects of salinity on plant growth and yield parameters. However, carrier-based inoculation further improved the efficacy of multi-strain consortium inoculation and significantly (P < 0.05) increased the growth, yield, and physiological parameters value of wheat at all salinity levels. On the basis of the observed trends in survival and the outcomes of the pot trials, the inoculation of multi-strain consortia in compost and biogas slurry carriers resulted in more successful wheat growth under salinity stress compared to that in the rest of the treatments tested. (C) 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据