4.4 Article

N=4 Super-Yang-Mills correlators at strong coupling from string theory and localization

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP12(2019)119

关键词

1/N Expansion; AdS-CFT Correspondence; Extended Supersymmetry

资金

  1. Simons Foundation [488653]
  2. General Sir John Monash Foundation
  3. Zuckerman STEM Leadership Fellowship
  4. US NSF [PHY-1620059, 1820651]
  5. Alfred P. Sloan Research Fellowship
  6. Division Of Physics
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1820651] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We compute 1/lambda corrections to the four-point functions of half-BPS operators in SU(N) N = 4 super-Yang-Mills theory at large N and large 't Hooft coupling lambda = g(YM)(2)N using two methods. Firstly, we relate integrals of these correlators to derivatives of the mass deformed S-4 free energy, which was computed at leading order in large N and to all orders in 1/lambda using supersymmetric localization. Secondly, we use AdS/CFT to relate these 1/lambda corrections to higher derivative corrections to supergravity for scattering amplitudes of Kaluza-Klein scalars in IIB string theory on AdS(5) x S-5, which in the flat space limit are known from worldsheet calculations. These two methods match at the order corresponding to the tree level R-4 interaction in string theory, which provides a precise check of AdS/CFT beyond supergravity, and allow us to derive the holographic correlators to tree level (DR4)-R-4 order. Combined with constraints from [1], our results can be used to derive CFT data to one-loop (DR4)-R-4 order. Finally, we use AdS/CFT to fix these correlators in the limit where N is taken to be large while g(YM) is kept fixed. In this limit, we present a conjecture for the small mass limit of the S-4 partition function that includes all instanton corrections and is written in terms of the same Eisenstein series that appear in the study of string theory scattering amplitudes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据