4.4 Article

Nonperturbative corrections to soft drop jet mass

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP12(2019)002

关键词

Effective Field Theories; Nonperturbative Effects; Perturbative QCD; Re-summation

资金

  1. FWF Austrian Science Fund [P28535N27]
  2. FWF Austrian Science Fund under the Doctoral Program Particles and Interactions [W1252-N27]
  3. Office of Nuclear Physics of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SCD011090]
  4. Simons Foundation [327942]
  5. Center for Theoretical Physics, MIT
  6. ESI workshop on Challenges and Concepts for Field Theory and Applications in the Era of LHC Run-2

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We provide a quantum field theory based description of the nonperturbative effects from hadronization for soft drop groomed jet mass distributions using the soft- collinear effective theory and the coherent branching formalism. There are two distinct regions of jet mass m(J) where grooming modifies hadronization effects. In a region with intermediate m(J) an operator expansion can be used, and the leading power corrections are given by three universal nonperturbative parameters that are independent of all kinematic variables and grooming parameters, and only depend on whether the parton initiating the jet is a quark or gluon. The leading power corrections in this region cannot be described by a standard normalized shape function. These power corrections depend on the kinematics of the subjet that stops soft drop through short distance coefficients, which encode a perturbatively calculable dependence on the jet transverse momentum, jet rapidity, and on the soft drop grooming parameters z(cut) and beta. Determining this dependence requires a resummation of large logarithms, which we carry out at LL order. For smaller m(J) there is a nonperturbative region described by a one-dimensional shape function that is unusual because it is not normalized to unity, and has a non-trivial dependence on beta.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据