4.6 Article

In-situ assembly of TiO2 with high exposure of (001) facets on three-dimensional porous graphene aerogel for lithium-sulfur battery

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGY CHEMISTRY
卷 49, 期 -, 页码 316-322

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jechem.2020.03.011

关键词

Lithium-sulfur battery; Porous graphene aerogel; Anatase (001); Immobilization of sulfur; Electrochemical performance

资金

  1. National Key R and D Program of China [2019YFA0210300]
  2. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2019JJ40359]
  3. Hunan Provincial S and T Plan of China [2017TP1001, 2016TP1007]
  4. Open-End Fund for the Valuable and Precision Instruments of Central South University [CSUZC2020016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Resulting from the development of electric vehicles, high energy-density Li-S batteries have recently attracted ever-increasing attentions worldwide. However, continuous dissolution of cathodic sulfur and followed shuttle effect of polysulfides lead to very limited service lifetime for currently-applied Li-S batteries. Herein, a 3D porous graphene aerogel (GA) decorated with high exposure of anatase TiO2 (001) nanoplatelets is proposed as robust host to immobilize cathodic sulfur. Compared with commonly used TiO2 (101) nanoparticles, the TiO2 (001) nanoplatelets have highly matched lattices with graphene (002) nanosheets, thus facilitating the electronic transfer. The in-site assembled TiO2@GA host exhibits superior sulfur-immobilized capability, which cannot only entrap sulfur by physical confinement, but also capture dissoluble sulfurous species by chemical bonding. The fabricated S@TiO2@GA cathode shows excellent electrochemical performance with high discharge capacity, superior rate capability, and durable cycling stability as well, supposed to be a promising cathode for high-performance Li-S battery applications. (C) 2020 Science Press and Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. and Science Press. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据