4.7 Article

Virtual Energy Storage Sharing and Capacity Allocation

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 1112-1123

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSG.2019.2932057

关键词

Energy storage; Virtualization; Investment; Pricing; Optimization; Load modeling; Discharges (electric); Energy storage; storage virtualization; business model; two-stage optimization

资金

  1. Presidential Fund from The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China
  2. Shenzhen Institute of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics for Society
  3. NSF [ECCS-1509536]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Energy storage can play an important role in energy management of end users. To promote an efficient utilization of energy storage, we develop a novel business model to enable virtual storage sharing among a group of users. Specifically, a storage aggregator invests and operates the central physical storage unit, by virtualizing it into separable virtual capacities and selling to users. Each user purchases the virtual capacity, and utilize it to reduce the energy cost. We formulate the interaction between the aggregator and users as a two-stage optimization problem. In Stage 1, over the investment horizon, the aggregator determines the investment and pricing decisions. In Stage 2, in each operational horizon, each user decides the virtual capacity to purchase together with the operation of the virtual storage. We characterize a stepwise form of the optimal solution of Stage-2 problem and a piecewise linear structure of the optimal profit of Stage-1 problem, both with respect to the virtual capacity price. Based on the solution structure, we design an algorithm to attain the optimal solution of the two-stage problem. In our simulation results, the proposed storage virtualization model can reduce the physical energy storage investment of the aggregator by 54.3% and reduce the users' total costs by 34.7%, compared to the case where users acquire their own physical storage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据