4.7 Article

Overexpression of PdC3H17 Confers Tolerance to Drought Stress Depending on Its CCCH Domain in Populus

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01748

关键词

the CCCH domain; drought tolerance; ROS scavenging activity; xylem vessel cell number; Populus

资金

  1. National Key Scientific Research Project of China [2016YFD0600104]
  2. National Key Program on Transgenic Research [2018ZX08020002]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31670606, 31570670, 31770315, 31700526]
  4. Major Basic Research Project of Shandong Natural Science Foundation [ZR2018ZC0335]
  5. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation [ZR2017BC096, ZR2017BC078, ZR2019BC006]
  6. Taishan Scholar Program of Shandong

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plant CCCH zinc finger proteins control growth, development, and stress responses mainly at the post-transcriptional level. Currently, limited reports are available about the roles of plant CCCH proteins in drought tolerance. In this study, we provided evidence showing that PdC3H17 from Populus deltoides x P. euramericana involves drought tolerance and response. Overexpression of PdC3H17 in poplar caused dwarf, resulted in higher stem water potential, and showed increased photosynthetic and ROS-scavenging abilities, thereby enhancing tolerance to drought stress, compared to controls. Accordingly, after drought treatment the stem elongation and thickening rates of these overexpression lines were higher than those of the controls. However, overexpression of the coding region excluding the CCCH domain of PdC3H17 roughly exhibited WT-like physiological and drought-resistant phenotypes, indicating the requirement of the CCCH domain for PdC3H17 controlling these processes. In addition, N-terminal sequence of PdC3H17 was found to possess transcriptional activity ability in yeast cells. Together, our results suggest that PdC3H17 may depend on its CCCH domain to control drought tolerance in Populus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据