4.8 Article

Anti-PD-1 immunotherapy leads to tuberculosis reactivation via dysregulation of TNF-α

期刊

ELIFE
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

eLIFE SCIENCES PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.52668

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [MR/P023754/1, MR/N006631/1, MR/S024220/1]
  2. Medical Research Innovation Grant 2017
  3. Wellcome Trust [210662/Z/18/Z, FC0010218, 203135, 104803]
  4. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1137006]
  5. Cancer Research UK [23562]
  6. UK Research and Innovation [FC0010218]
  7. National Institutes of Health [U19AI111276]
  8. National Institute for Health Research Academic Clinical Lectureship
  9. MRC [MR/S024220/1, MR/N006631/1, MR/P023754/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Wellcome Trust [210662/Z/18/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  11. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1137006] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previously, we developed a 3-dimensional cell culture model of human tuberculosis (TB) and demonstrated its potential to interrogate the host-pathogen interaction (Tezera et al., 2017a). Here, we use the model to investigate mechanisms whereby immune checkpoint therapy for cancer paradoxically activates TB infection. In patients, PD-1 is expressed in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb)-infected lung tissue but is absent in areas of immunopathology. In the microsphere model, PD-1 ligands are up-regulated by infection, and the PD-1/PD-L1 axis is further induced by hypoxia. Inhibition of PD-1 signalling increases Mtb growth, and augments cytokine secretion. TNF-alpha is responsible for accelerated Mtb growth, and TNF-alpha neutralisation reverses augmented Mtb growth caused by anti-PD-1 treatment. In human TB, pulmonary TNF-alpha immunoreactivity is increased and circulating PD-1 expression negatively correlates with sputum TNF-alpha concentrations. Together, our findings demonstrate that PD-1 regulates the immune response in TB, and inhibition of PD-1 accelerates Mtb growth via excessive TNF-alpha secretion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据