4.6 Article

NIR-II/III Luminescence Ratiometric Nanothermometry with Phonon-Tuned Sensitivity

期刊

ADVANCED OPTICAL MATERIALS
卷 8, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adom.201901173

关键词

dominant phonons; lanthanide; luminescence ratiometric thermometry; NIR-II; III biological windows; phonon-tuned sensitivity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11874182, 51672063]
  2. Science and Technology Development Planning Project of Jilin Province [20160101294JC]
  3. Special funds for provincial industrial innovation in Jilin Province [2018C043-4]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Luminescence nanothermometers are promising for noninvasive, high resolution thermographics ranging from aeronautics to biomedicine. Yet, limited success has been met in the NIR-II/III biological windows, which allow temperature evaluation in deep tissues. Herein, a new type of phonon-based ratiometric thermometry is described that utilizes the luminescence intensity ratio (LIR) between holmium (Ho3+) emission at approximate to 1190 nm (NIR-II) and erbium (Er3+) emission at approximate to 1550 nm (NIR-III) from a set of oxide nanoparticles of varying host lattices. It is shown that multi-phonon relaxation in Er3+ ions and phonon-assisted transfer process in Ho3+ ions play a significant role in LIR determination through channeling the harvested excitation energy to the corresponding emitting states. As a result, temperature sensitivity can be tuned by the dominant phonon energy of host lattice, thus endowing aqueous yttrium oxide (Y2O3, 376 cm(-1)) nanoparticles to have a relative temperature sensitivity of 1.01% K-1 and absolute temperature sensitivity of 0.0127 K-1 at 65 degrees C in a physiological temperature range (25-65 degrees C). And their temperature sensing for biological tissues is further explored and the influence of water and chicken breast on thermometry is discussed. This work constitutes a solid step forward to build sensitive NIR-II/III nanothermometers for biological applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据