4.6 Article

Solvent-Free Synthesis of Mg-Incorporated Nanocrystalline SAPO-34 Zeolites via Natural Clay for Chloromethane-to-Olefin Conversion

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 8, 期 10, 页码 4185-4193

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b07129

关键词

MgAPSO-34; Zeolite; Mg-rich clay; Light olefins; Chloromethane

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21773286, U1832162, 91845105]
  2. Transformational Technologies for Clean Energy and Demonstration, Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA21090204, XDA21090201]
  3. Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS [2018330]
  4. Shanghai Rising-Star Program, China [19QA1409900]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Isomorphous substitution is an important approach in modifying the acidity and pore structure of nanoscale SAPO-34 zeolites, which can bring about active sites stemming from heteroatoms. However, it remains a major challenge to use conventional hydrothermal methods to synthesize cost-effective, all-framework heteroatoms, and environmentally friendly catalysts. Herein, an efficient and eco-friendly approach is developed for the solvent-free synthesis of Mg-incorporated SAPO-34 (MgAPSO-34) with Mg content of up to 6.65% and smaller crystal size (50 nm) by taking advantage of a natural layered Mg-rich aluminosilicate clay mineral. Characterizations with X-ray diffraction, magic-angle spinning NMR, and ultraviolet-visible spectroscopies show that all the Mg can enter the zeolitic framework by replacing the Al sites. In addition, MgAPSO-34 with the incorporation of a proper amount of Mg exhibits a high specific surface area and moderate acidity and thus shows excellent performance and anticoke capacity in the chloromethane-to-olefin reaction. The combination of green synthesis and superior catalytic properties allows for low-cost and environmentally friendly synthesis of isomorphous substituted SAPO-34 zeolites with high crystallinity and high quality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据