4.6 Article

Novel Recovered Compound Phosphate Fertilizer Produced from Sewage Sludge and Its Incinerated Ash

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 8, 期 17, 页码 6611-6621

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b06861

关键词

phosphorus recovery; incinerated sewage sludge ash; sewage sludge biochar

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC1902904]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51772141]
  3. Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee [KQJSCX2018032215150778, JCYJ20170412154335393]
  4. Shenzhen Peacock Plan [KQTD20160226195840229]
  5. Guangdong Province Universities and Colleges Pearl River Scholar Funded Scheme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Current disposal methods of sewage sludge (SS) and its incinerated ash (ISSA) do not allow for the recycling of the phosphorus (P) present. The aim of this study was to fabricate a P compound fertilizer by using an optimal SS-derived biochar (SSB) with enhanced inherent Ca-P content to load P from the P extract of ISSA. For this purpose, SS was impregnated with four agents (MgCl2, CaCl2, MgO, and CaO) at mass ratios of 20 or 10% and pyrolyzed at 700 or 300 degrees C. Characterization of the produced SSBs indicated that those with 20% MgCl2, CaO, and MgO added and pyrolyzed at 700 degrees C exhibited high surface areas, abundant mesopores, and abundant plant-valuable P. When in contact with the P extract, these three SSBs showed the highest P adsorption efficiencies among the obtained SSBs but CaO/MgO-impregnated SSBs have more metal coprecipitation. The postsorption SSBs were P-enhanced and alkalinity decreased, which are favorable for fertilizer application. Furthermore, a pot experiment verified that these three postsorption SSBs had a comparable P fertilizer effect to that of the commercial P fertilizer. Therefore, the MgCl2-impregnated SSB with P loading from the ISSA extract has potential as a P fertilizer alternative that can support global P sustainability by reclaiming P from SS and ISSA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据