4.6 Article

Valorization of Coal Fly Ash as a Stabilizer for the Development of Ni/CaO-Based Bifunctional Material

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 8, 期 9, 页码 3885-3895

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b07360

关键词

coal fly ash; stabilizer; CaO-based sorbent; bifunctional material; sorption-enhanced glycerol steam reforming; high purity H-2 production

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. China Scholarship Council [201708130079]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sorption-enhanced glycerol steam reforming (SEGSR) is considered as one of the promising processes for H-2 production by combining glycerol steam reforming with simultaneous CO2 capture in a single-unit operation. The key challenge for a successful SEGSR process is the selection of suitable high-temperature CO2 sorbents with high resistance to sintering. In the present work, an attempt was made to modify a CaO-based sorbent by adding different types of coal fly ash (FA1-FA12) to develop highly effective and economical CaO-based sorbents suitable for CO2 removal at high temperatures. Among the synthesized sorbents, the 90%CaO FA5 sorbent offered the most stable CO2 capture activity over 20 cycles, with a CO2 capture capacity of 0.58 g(cO2)/g(sorbent) at the 1st cycle and 0.45 g(co2)/g(sorbent) at the 20th cycle. This can be attributed to the relatively high amounts of SiO2 and mullite (inert materials) in FAS compared with those of the other FA-containing samples. The presence of these inert materials helps enhancing the sorbent stability by hindering their aggregation and sintering. This sorbent was then selected to synthesize a bifunctional catalyst sorbent material for H-2 production via SEGSR The 15%Ni-CaO-FA5 bifunctional material exhibited a stable H-2 purity of similar to 97% and a H-2 yield of 90% for 30 min (prebreakthrough) of the SEGSR reaction. These results highlight the high potential of FAS as a low-cost stabilizer for improving the stability of CaO-based sorbents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据