4.6 Article

Reactive Template and Confined Self-Activation Strategy: Three-Dimensional Interconnected Hierarchically Porous N/O-Doped Carbon Foam for Enhanced Supercapacitors

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 8, 期 2, 页码 739-748

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b01394

关键词

hierarchically porous carbon foam; supercapacitor; in situ doping; reactive template; confined self-activation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21676127, 21776110]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20170532, BK20160568, BK20160501]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M620194]
  4. Jiangsu Planned Projects for Postdoctoral Research Funds [1701023A]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of the Higher Education Institutions of Jiangsu Province, China [17KJB430011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Herein, we report a new reactive template and confined self-activation strategy for the preparation of three-dimensional interconnected hierarchically porous N/O-doped carbon foam (3DHPNCF), which contains abundant micropores, mesopores, and macropores via using mesoporous silica SBA-15 as a hard template and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid tripotassium (EDTA-3K) as a single carbon/nitrogen precursor, respectively. Importantly, potassium carbonate produced by the pyrolysis of EDTA-3K can effectively react with the SBA-15 silica skeleton to form water-soluble potassium silicate, after hot-water removal, leading to a continuous macropore structure. Simultaneously, a confined alkali activation reaction is carried out between potassium carbonate and in situ as-formed carbon to create meso/micropores. 3DHPNCF exhibits the high specific surface area and pore volume, as well as rich content of in situ-doped oxygen/nitrogen element, contributing to the high specific capacitance, good rate capability, and outstanding cycling stability. We provide a novel, green, and universal strategy for the design and fabrication of novel hierarchically porous carbons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据