4.6 Article

Eco-friendly Hybrids of Carbon Quantum Dots Modified MoS2 for Rapid Microbial Inactivation by Strengthened Photocatalysis

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 534-542

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b06045

关键词

photocatalysis; carbon quantum dots; MoS2; photothermal; antibacterial

资金

  1. Natural Science Fund of Hubei Province [2018CFA064]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51671081, 51871162, 51801056, 51925104]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC1100600, 2016YFC1100604]
  4. Hong Kong Research Grants Council (RGC) General Research Funds (GRF) [11301215, 11205617, 17214516]
  5. RGC/NSFC [N_HKU725-16]
  6. Hong Kong ITC [ITS/287/17, GHX/002/14SZ]
  7. Health and Medical Research Fund [03142446]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacteria are widespread in the environment, and antibiotics are usually used in large doses to kill the bacteria, which consequently leads to the appearance of drug-resistance bacteria. As a result, the development of new and non-antibiotic antibacterial material is in urgent need. Herein, the molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) nanosheet, which shows photocatalytic and photothermal properties, was modified with N-doping carbon quantum dots (CQDs). The CQDs could transport the photogenerated electrons produced by MoS2 nanosheets, preventing the recombination of electrons and holes, resulting in a much higher photocatalytic property. Because of the enhanced photocatalytic properties, these MoS2/CQDs hybrids could kill bacteria highly effectively, with antibacterial ratios of 99.38 and 99.99% against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli, respectively. Meanwhile, the hybrids exhibit good biocompatibility, which can prevent the potential side effect to both human and environment. Furthermore, through a simple spin-coating method, the MoS2/CQDs hybrids could also form a coating on the basement, e.g., Ti, and act as an antibacterial coating to prevent bacterial infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据