4.6 Review

Concise review: Pulp stem cells derived from human permanent and deciduous teeth: Biological characteristics and therapeutic applications

期刊

STEM CELLS TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
卷 9, 期 4, 页码 445-464

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1002/sctm.19-0398

关键词

cell banking; cell homing; pulp stem cells; pulp-dentin regeneration; tissue regeneration

资金

  1. Key Project of Health Commission of Hubei Province [WJ2019Z006]
  2. Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation [L182005]
  3. National Natural Science Foundations of China [81871492, 81571815]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human pulp stem cells (PSCs) include dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) isolated from dental pulp tissues of human extracted permanent teeth and stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED). Depending on their multipotency and sensitivity to local paracrine activity, DPSCs and SHED exert therapeutic applications at multiple levels beyond the scope of the stomatognathic system. This review is specifically concentrated on PSC updated biological characteristics and their promising therapeutic applications in (pre)clinical practice. Biologically, distinguished from conventional mesenchymal stem cell markers in vitro, NG2, Gli1, and Celsr1 have been evidenced as PSC markers in vivo. Both perivascular cells and glial cells account for PSC origin. Therapeutically, endodontic regeneration is where PSCs hold the most promises, attributable of PSCs' robust angiogenic, neurogenic, and odontogenic capabilities. More recently, the interplay between cell homing and liberated growth factors from dentin matrix has endowed a novel approach for pulp-dentin complex regeneration. In addition, PSC transplantation for extraoral tissue repair and regeneration has achieved immense progress, following their multipotential differentiation and paracrine mechanism. Accordingly, PSC banking is undergoing extensively with the intent of advancing tissue engineering, disease remodeling, and (pre)clinical treatments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据