4.6 Review

Therapeutic vascularization in regenerative medicine: Concise Review

期刊

STEM CELLS TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
卷 9, 期 4, 页码 433-444

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1002/sctm.19-0319

关键词

extracellular matrix; genetic therapy; ischemia; neovascularization; tissue engineering; vascular endothelial growth factor

资金

  1. Department of Surgery of Basel University Hospital
  2. Swiss Nanoscience Institute
  3. European Union H2020 Program [801159, 646075]
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation [182357]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Therapeutic angiogenesis, that is, the generation of new vessels by delivery of specific factors, is required both for rapid vascularization of tissue-engineered constructs and to treat ischemic conditions. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is the master regulator of angiogenesis. However, uncontrolled expression can lead to aberrant vascular growth and vascular tumors (angiomas). Major challenges to fully exploit VEGF potency for therapy include the need to precisely control in vivo distribution of growth factor dose and duration of expression. In fact, the therapeutic window of VEGF delivery depends on its amount in the microenvironment around each producing cell rather than on the total dose, since VEGF remains tightly bound to extracellular matrix (ECM). On the other hand, short-term expression of less than about 4 weeks leads to unstable vessels, which promptly regress following cessation of the angiogenic stimulus. Here, we will briefly overview some key aspects of the biology of VEGF and angiogenesis and discuss their therapeutic implications with a particular focus on approaches using gene therapy, genetically modified progenitors, and ECM engineering with recombinant factors. Lastly, we will present recent insights into the mechanisms that regulate vessel stabilization and the switch between normal and aberrant vascular growth after VEGF delivery, to identify novel molecular targets that may improve both safety and efficacy of therapeutic angiogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据