4.7 Article

Surface-Engineered Li4Ti5O12 Nanostructures for High-Power Li-Ion Batteries

期刊

NANO-MICRO LETTERS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s40820-020-0366-x

关键词

Ultrafast charging; Li-ion battery; Lithium titanate; Off-stoichiometric synthesis; Surface chemistry

资金

  1. Science and Engineering Research Board, India [SB/S2/RJN-100/2014]
  2. Department of Science and Technology, India [DST/TMD/MES/2k17/11]
  3. Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Materials with high-power charge-discharge capabilities are of interest to overcome the power limitations of conventional Li-ion batteries. In this study, a unique solvothermal synthesis of Li4Ti5O12 nanoparticles is proposed by using an off-stoichiometric precursor ratio. A Li-deficient off-stoichiometry leads to the coexistence of phase-separated crystalline nanoparticles of Li4Ti5O12 and TiO2 exhibiting reasonable high-rate performances. However, after the solvothermal process, an extended aging of the hydrolyzed solution leads to the formation of a Li4Ti5O12 nanoplate-like structure with a self-assembled disordered surface layer without crystalline TiO2. The Li4Ti5O12 nanoplates with the disordered surface layer deliver ultrahigh-rate performances for both charging and discharging in the range of 50-300C and reversible capacities of 156 and 113 mAh g(-1) at these two rates, respectively. Furthermore, the electrode exhibits an ultrahigh-charging-rate capability up to 1200C (60 mAh g(-1); discharge limited to 100C). Unlike previously reported high-rate half cells, we demonstrate a high-power Li-ion battery by coupling Li4Ti5O12 with a high-rate LiMn2O4 cathode. The full cell exhibits ultrafast charging/discharging for 140 and 12 s while retaining 97 and 66% of the anode theoretical capacity, respectively. Room- (25 degrees C), low- (-10 degrees C), and high- (55 degrees C) temperature cycling data show the wide temperature operation range of the cell at a high rate of 100C.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据