4.3 Article

Suitability of SBR for Wastewater Treatment and Reuse: Pilot-Scale Reactor Operated in Different Anoxic Conditions

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17051617

关键词

sequencing batch reactor; pilot-scale treatment; nitrogen and phosphorus removal; domestic wastewater treatment; sustainable wastewater management; arid regions

资金

  1. King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST), Saudi Arabia [10-WAT1336-46]
  2. Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) at Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University (IAU)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study investigates the performance of a pilot-scale Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) process for the treatment of wastewater quality parameters, including turbidity, total suspended solids (TSS), total solids (TS), nitrogen (ammonia (NH3-N), nitrite (NO2-), and nitrate (NO3-), phosphate (PO43-), the chemical oxygen demand (COD), and the 5-day biological oxygen demand (BOD5), from municipal wastewater. Two scenarios, namely, pre-anoxic denitrification and post-anoxic denitrification, were investigated to examine the performance of a pilot-scale SBR on the wastewater quality parameters, particularly the nitrogen removal. The correlation statistic was applied to explain the effects of operational parameters on the performance of the SBR system. The results revealed that the post-anoxic denitrification scenario was more efficient for higher qualify effluent than the first scenario. The effluent concentrations of the targeted wastewater quality parameters obtained for the proposed SBR system were below those of the local standards, while its performance was better than that of the North Sewage Treatment Plant, Dharan, Eastern province, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), in terms of the BOD5, COD, TN, and PO43- treatment efficiencies. These results indicated the suitability of SBR technology for wastewater treatment in remote areas in the KSA, with a high potential of reusability for sustainable wastewater management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据