4.7 Article

Nonrigid Point Set Registration With Robust Transformation Learning Under Manifold Regularization

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TNNLS.2018.2872528

关键词

Manifolds; Visualization; Task analysis; Shape; Estimation; Kernel; Three-dimensional displays; Manifold regularization; nonrigid; point set registration; robust estimation; visual homing

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61773295, 61503288, 61501413, 41501505]
  2. Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Intelligent Robots and Systems [2016IRS15]
  3. MQ EPS [9201701455]
  4. MQNS [9201701203]
  5. Macquarie University [92307766]
  6. Data61 [92307766]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper solves the problem of nonrigid point set registration by designing a robust transformation learning scheme. The principle is to iteratively establish point correspondences and learn the nonrigid transformation between two given sets of points. In particular, the local feature descriptors are used to search the correspondences and some unknown outliers will be inevitably introduced. To precisely learn the underlying transformation from noisy correspondences, we cast the point set registration into a semisupervised learning problem, where a set of indicator variables is adopted to help distinguish outliers in a mixture model. To exploit the intrinsic structure of a point set, we constrain the transformation with manifold regularization which plays a role of prior knowledge. Moreover, the transformation is modeled in the reproducing kernel Hilbert space, and a sparsity-induced approximation is utilized to boost efficiency. We apply the proposed method to learning motion flows between image pairs of similar scenes for visual homing, which is a specific type of mobile robot navigation. Extensive experiments on several publicly available data sets reveal the superiority of the proposed method over state-of-the-art competitors, particularly in the context of the degenerated data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据