4.7 Article

A proactive genotype-to-patient-phenotype map for cystathionine beta-synthase

期刊

GENOME MEDICINE
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13073-020-0711-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. One Brave Idea Initiative (American Heart Association)
  2. One Brave Idea Initiative (Verily Life Sciences LLC)
  3. One Brave Idea Initiative (Astra-Zeneca, Inc.)
  4. National Human Genome Research Institute of the National Institutes of Health (NIH/NHGRI) Center of Excellence in Genomic Science (CEGS) Initiative [HG004233]
  5. Canadian Excellence Research Chairs (CERC) Program
  6. Canadian Institutes of Health Research Foundation
  7. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  8. Ministry of Health [RVO-VFN 64165]
  9. Czech Health Research Council [NV19-0100307]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background For the majority of rare clinical missense variants, pathogenicity status cannot currently be classified. Classical homocystinuria, characterized by elevated homocysteine in plasma and urine, is caused by variants in the cystathionine beta-synthase (CBS) gene, most of which are rare. With early detection, existing therapies are highly effective. Methods Damaging CBS variants can be detected based on their failure to restore growth in yeast cells lacking the yeast ortholog CYS4. This assay has only been applied reactively, after first observing a variant in patients. Using saturation codon-mutagenesis, en masse growth selection, and sequencing, we generated a comprehensive, proactive map of CBS missense variant function. Results Our CBS variant effect map far exceeds the performance of computational predictors of disease variants. Map scores correlated strongly with both disease severity (Spearman's rho = 0.9) and human clinical response to vitamin B-6 (rho = 0.93). Conclusions We demonstrate that highly multiplexed cell-based assays can yield proactive maps of variant function and patient response to therapy, even for rare variants not previously seen in the clinic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据