4.8 Article

A Dynamic Folded Hairpin Conformation Is Associated with α-Globin Activation in Erythroid Cells

期刊

CELL REPORTS
卷 30, 期 7, 页码 2125-2135

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.01.044

关键词

-

资金

  1. EU H2020 Marie Curie [813282]
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [1U54DK107977-01]
  3. CINECA ISCRA [HP10CRTY8P]
  4. Einstein BIH Fellowship Award [EVF-BIH-2016-282]
  5. Regione Campania SATIN Project 2018-2020
  6. Medical Research Council [MC_UU_00016, MR/N00969X/1]
  7. MRC [MC_UU_00016/12, MR/N00969X/1, MC_U137961145, G1000801, MC_UU_00016/1, MC_U137961144, MC_PC_15069, MC_UU_12009/15, MC_UU_00016/14, MC_UU_12009/13, MC_UU_12009/4, MC_UU_00016/4] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [813282] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigate the three-dimensional (3D) conformations of the alpha-globin locus at the single-allele level in murine embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and erythroid cells, combining polymer physics models and high-resolution Capture-C data. Model predictions are validated against independent fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) data measuring pairwise distances, and Tri-C data identifying three-way contacts. The architecture is rearranged during the transition from ESCs to erythroid cells, associated with the activation of the globin genes. We find that in ESCs, the spatial organization conforms to a highly intermingled 3D structure involving non-specific contacts, whereas in erythroid cells the alpha-globin genes and their enhancers form a self-contained domain, arranged in a folded hairpin conformation, separated from intermingling flanking regions by a thermodynamic mechanism of micro-phase separation. The flanking regions are rich in convergent CTCF sites, which only marginally participate in the erythroid-specific gene-enhancer contacts, suggesting that beyond the interaction of CTCF sites, multiple molecular mechanisms cooperate to form an interacting domain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据