4.7 Article

Remotely-sensed planform morphologies reveal fluvial and tidal nature of meandering channels

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-56992-w

关键词

-

资金

  1. Shell International Exploration and Production
  2. University of Padova [BIRD168939]
  3. HYDROSEM: Fluvial and tidal meanders of the venetian-Po plain: from hydrodynamics to stratigraphy project (Progetto di Eccellenza CARIPARO)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Meandering channels extensively dissect fluvial and tidal landscapes, critically controlling their morphodynamic evolution and sedimentary architecture. In spite of an apparently striking dissimilarity of the governing processes, planform dimensions of tidal and fluvial meanders consistently scale to local channel width, and previous studies were unable to identify quantitative planimetric differences between these landforms. Here we use satellite imagery, measurements of meandering patterns, and different statistical analyses applied to about 10,000 tidal and fluvial meanders worldwide to objectively disclose fingerprints of the different physical processes they are shaped by. We find that fluvial and tidal meanders can be distinguished on the exclusive basis of their remotely-sensed planforms. Moreover, we show that tidal meanders are less morphologically complex and display more spatially homogeneous characteristics compared to fluvial meanders. Based on existing theoretical, numerical, and field studies, we suggest that our empirical observations can be explained by the more regular processes carving tidal meanders, as well as by the higher lithological homogeneity of the substrates they typically cut through. Allowing one to effectively infer processes from landforms, a fundamental inverse problem in geomorphology, our results have relevant implications for the conservation and restoration of tidal environments, as well as from planetary exploration perspectives.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据