4.7 Article

c-Cbl targets PD-1 in immune cells for proteasomal degradation and modulates colorectal tumor growth

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-56208-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. Evans Faculty Merit award
  2. NIH [R01 HL132325]
  3. T32 Research Training in Nephrology [T32 DK007053-44]
  4. T32 Research Training in Cardiovascular medicine [T32 HL007224-40]
  5. T32 Research Training in Immunobiology of trauma [T32 GM086308-06A1]
  6. [R01CA175382]
  7. [R21CA191970]
  8. [R21CA193958]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Casitas B lymphoma (c-Cbl) is an E3 ubiquitin ligase and a negative regulator of colorectal cancer (CRC). Despite its high expression in immune cells, the effect of c-Cbl on the tumor microenvironment remains poorly understood. Here we demonstrate that c-Cbl alters the tumor microenvironment and suppresses Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) protein, an immune checkpoint receptor. Using syngeneic CRC xenografts, we observed significantly higher growth of xenografts and infiltrating immune cells in c-Cbl(+/-) compared to c-Cbl(+/+) mice. Tumor-associated CD8+ T-lymphocytes and macrophages of c-Cbl+/- mice showed 2-3-fold higher levels of PD-1. Functionally, macrophages from c-Cbl+/- mice showed a 4-5-fold reduction in tumor phagocytosis, which was restored with an anti-PD-1 neutralizing antibody suggesting regulation of PD-1 by c-Cbl. Further mechanistic probing revealed that C-terminus of c-Cbl interacted with the cytoplasmic tail of PD-1. c-Cbl destabilized PD-1 through ubiquitination-proteasomal degradation depending on c-Cbl's RING finger function. This data demonstrates c-Cbl as an E3 ligase of PD-1 and a regulator of tumor microenvironment, both of which were unrecognized components of its tumor suppressive activity. Advancing immune checkpoint and c-Cbl biology, our study prompts for probing of PD-1 regulation by c-Cbl in conditions driven by immune checkpoint abnormalities such as cancers and autoimmune diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据