4.7 Article

Bruch's membrane opening enlargement and its implication on the myopic optic nerve head

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-55926-w

关键词

-

资金

  1. Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the NRF - Korean government [NRF-2017M3A9E8023019]
  2. Chonnam National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute [BCRI18019, BCRI18025]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017M3A9E8023019] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We examined the association between Bruch's membrane opening (BMO) area and various ocular parameters and investigated the implication of BMO enlargement on the myopic optic nerve head. One hundred eighty-five myopic eyes were included in this cross-sectional study. Among the included eyes, 53 having axial lengths between 26 and 27 mm were further analyzed to investigate the association between BMO area and various ocular parameters. BMO area, BMO-minimum rim width (BMO-MRW), peripapillary choroidal thickness (pCT), width of beta-parapapillary atrophy with and without Bruch's membrane (PPA(+BM) and PPA(-BM)), and presence of lamina cribrosa (LC) defect were evaluated. We found that BMO area tended to increase with increasing axial length, but varied among the highly myopic eyes even though they had similar degrees of myopia. In the subgroup analysis of eyes with axial lengths between 26 and 27 mm, BMO area was highly variable and it significantly correlated with PPA(-BM) width and temporal-inferior, nasal-inferior, and nasal BMO-MRW and pCT. LC defects were more common in myopic eyes with enlarged BMO. A multivariate regression model revealed that higher intraocular pressure, enlarged BMO, and thinner BMO-MRW were associated with LC defects in highly myopic eyes. These findings should be considered when evaluating myopic eyes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据