4.7 Article

Development and Predictors of Sarcopenic Dysphagia during Hospitalization of Older Adults

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu12010070

关键词

acute care; bed rest; deconditioning; sarcopenia; swallowing difficulty

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [18K11142]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18K11142] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to investigate the impact of sarcopenia and sarcopenia-related conditions on the development of swallowing disorders during hospitalization. Older adult inpatients (n = 8768) without swallowing disorders in the premorbid period were studied. Sarcopenia-related conditions were evaluated in terms of nutritional status, physical status, and ambulatory conditions as well as hand-grip strength and muscle mass assessed by calf circumference. Development of swallowing disorders was defined based on food texture at discharge from the hospital. The patients' mean age was 76.1 +/- 6.9 years. A total of 374 (4.3%) patients developed swallowing disorders during hospitalization. They were older, with poorer nutritional status, and had more decline of physical performance than those without swallowing disorders. Performance Status score (odds ratio (OR) = 1.28 (1.12-1.46) p < 0.001), ambulatory dependency (OR = 1.72 (1.09-2.71), p = 0.020), malnutrition score (OR = 0.92 (0.87-0.97), p = 0.002), insufficient nutritional intake (OR = 2.33 (1.60-3.40), p < 0.001), and length of stay (OR = 1.01 (1.00-1.01), p = 0.001) were independent contributing factors for swallowing disorder development in the multivariate analysis. The presence of possible sarcopenia was also a contributor to swallowing disorder development. In conclusion, swallowing disorders could develop in patients with possible sarcopenia and sarcopenia-related conditions during hospitalization. Clinicians should be aware of this risk and provide appropriate interventions to prevent sarcopenic dysphagia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据