4.7 Article

CoO-Mo2N hollow heterostructure for high-efficiency electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction

期刊

NPG ASIA MATERIALS
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41427-019-0177-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key RAMP
  2. D Program of China [2018YFB1502401]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21571054, 21631004, 21805073, 21770159]
  4. Basic Research Fund of Heilongjiang University in Heilongjiang Province [RCYJTD201801]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [YQ2019B005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Driving the electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) with solar-energy cells is considered a green and sustainable way to produce H-2. Herein, CoO-Mo2N hollow heterojunctions were designed for effective HER based on the combined virtues of the hollow structure and heterojunctions. The hollow CoMoO4-Co(OH)(2) precursor was first synthesized via the reaction of Co2+ from ZIF-67 with MoO42- and OH- in a Na2MoO4 solution. A series of experiments indicate the formation of the hollow Co-Mo-O precursor followed a mechanism analogous to the nanoscale Kirkendall Effect. After heating in NH3, the CoO-Mo2N hollow heterostructure was obtained. The Mo species in the precursor played an important role in maintaining the morphology under nitridation treatment. The hollow structure is favorable for contact and diffusion of electrolyte with (in) catalysts, while the CoO in CoO-Mo2N is favorable for the dissociation of water. Both promote the HER. Under optimized conditions, the hollow catalyst exhibited good HER performance with an overpotential of 65 mV at 10 mA cm(-2) in 1 M KOH. The performance is better than that of many nonprecious metal-based catalysts. An electrolyzer composed of CoO-Mo2N heterojunctions as the cathode and NiFe-LDH as the anode can be driven by a solar cell to achieve effective overall water splitting. The adjudication of MOFs makes the route promising for the design of robust catalysts for advanced application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据