4.6 Article

Predictive model for the quantitative analysis of human skin using photothermal radiometry and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy

期刊

BIOMEDICAL OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 1679-1696

出版社

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/BOE.384982

关键词

-

资金

  1. Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS [N2-0128, P1-0192, P2-0103, PR-07590]
  2. Ministrstvo za Izobrazevanje, Znanost in Sport [C3330-17-529021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have recently introduced a novel methodology for the noninvasive analysis of the structure and composition of human skin in vivo. The approach combines pulsed photothermal radiometry (PPTR), involving time-resolved measurements of mid-infrared emission after irradiation with a millisecond light pulse, and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) in the visible part of the spectrum. Simultaneous fitting of both data sets with respective predictions from a numerical model of light transport in human skin enables the assessment of the contents of skin chromophores (melanin, oxy-, and deoxy-hemoglobin), as well as scattering properties and thicknesses of the epidermis and dermis. However, the involved iterative optimization of 14 skin model parameters using a numerical forward model (i.e., inverse Monte Carlo - IMC) is computationally very expensive. In order to overcome this drawback, we have constructed a very fast predictive model (PM) based on machine learning. The PM involves random forests, trained on similar to 9,000 examples computed using our forward MC model. We show that the performance of such a PM is very satisfying, both in objective testing using cross-validation and in direct comparisons with the IMC procedure. We also present a hybrid approach (HA), which combines the speed of the PM with versatility of the IMC procedure. Compared with the latter, the HA improves both the accuracy and robustness of the inverse analysis, while significantly reducing the computation times. (C) 2020 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据