4.8 Review

Fundamentals and Challenges of Lithium Ion Batteries at Temperatures between-40 and 60 °C

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 10, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201904152

关键词

cathode electrolyte interphase; charge transfer; extreme temperatures; lithium ion batteries; mass transport; solid electrolyte interphase; thermal stability

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21503134, 21406220]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0101201]
  3. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [15YF1406500]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium ion batteries (LIBs) continuously prove themselves to be the main power source in consumer electronics and electric vehicles. To ensure environmental sustainability, LIBs must be capable of performing well at extreme temperatures, that is, between -40 and 60 degrees C. In this review, the recent important progress and advances in the subzero and elevated temperature operations of LIBs is comprehensively summarized from a materials perspective. In the scenario of subzero temperatures, limitations, electrolytes, anodes, and solid electrolyte interphase (SEI); cathodes and cathode electrolyte interphase (CEI); and binders are thoroughly discussed to explore the fundamentals and basics that underlie the decay in electrochemical performance and how the chemistry, physics, and electrochemistry are correlated with the materials and components that interact with each other. In the case of high temperatures limitations, the thermal stability of the key materials and components are reviewed, and then the reaction thermodynamics and kinetics of the anodes, cathodes, electrolytes, and their interactions are described using the highest occupied molecular orbit (HOMO)/lowest unoccupied molecular orbit (LUMO), and are extensively discussed. The prospect of combining the extreme temperature poles in a single cell by introducing appropriate electrolytes and additives is discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据