4.8 Article

K-Ion Storage Enhancement in Sb2O3/Reduced Graphene Oxide Using Ether-Based Electrolyte

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 10, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201903455

关键词

ether-based electrolytes; high-concentration; K-ion batteries; reduce graphene oxide; Sb2O3

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51702056, 51772135, 21703081]
  2. Ministry of Education of China [6141A02022516]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [21617330]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M622902, 2019T120790]
  5. High-Performance Super Computing Platform of Jinan University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, an ether-based electrolyte is adopted instead of conventional ester-based electrolyte for an Sb2O3-based anode and its enhancement mechanism is unveiled for K-ion storage. The anode is fabricated by anchoring Sb2O3 onto reduced graphene oxide (Sb2O3-RGO) and it exhibits better electrochemical performance using an ether-based electrolyte than that using a conventional ester-based electrolyte. By optimizing the concentration of the electrolyte, the Sb2O3-RGO composite delivers a reversible specific capacity of 309 mAh g(-1) after 100 cycles at 100 mA g(-1). A high specific capacity of 201 mAh g(-1) still remains after 3300 cycles (111 days) at 500 mA g(-1) with almost no decay, exhibiting a longer cycle life compared with other metallic oxides. In order to further reveal the intrinsic mechanism, the energy changes for K atom migrating from surface into the sublayer of Sb2O3 are explored by density functional theory calculations. According to the result, the battery using the ether-based electrolyte exhibits a lower energy change and migration barrier than those using other electrolytes for K-ion, which is helpful to improve the K-ion storage performance. It is believed that the work can provide deep understanding and new insight to enhance electrochemical performance using ether-based electrolytes for KIBs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据