4.8 Article

Role of Boron in Enhancing the Catalytic Performance of Supported Platinum Catalysts for the Nonoxidative Dehydrogenation of n-Butane

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 1500-1510

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.9b04689

关键词

supported catalysts; platinum; boron; solid state NMR; XPS; DFT

资金

  1. Department of Energy (DOE), Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) funding at Argonne National Laboratory [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  2. University of Delaware
  3. NSF [9724307, 1428149]
  4. NIH NIGMS COBRE Program [P30-GM110758]
  5. Argonne National Laboratory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Platinum-based supported catalysts for hydrocarbon conversion are among the most effective for selective dehydrogenation and isomerization processes. However, high process temperatures and the possibility of coke formation require catalyst modifications to mitigate such effects. One of the emerging approaches to prevent platinum catalyst deactivation is the use of boron additives that have been proposed to prevent coking. Despite such a valuable property of boron, the mechanisms for extending the catalyst lifetime and the decrease in coke formation based on this method are still poorly understood. The type and transformations of boron species on silica surface were investigated as a function of boron introduction, platinum addition, catalyst activation, and catalytic reactivity by a combination of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, electron microscopy, solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and density functional theory calculations to uncover the possible role of boron modification in improving the catalytic performance. Catalytic nonoxidative dehydrogenation of n-butane revealed that incorporation of boron improved the catalytic activity (similar to 3x) and stability of Pt/SiO2. The role of boron in enhancing catalytic performance was attributed to facilitating the migration of alkyl groups from platinum catalytic centers to tetrahedrally coordinated boron sites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据