4.8 Article

Atomically Embedded Ag via Electrodiffusion Boosts Oxygen Evolution of CoOOH Nanosheet Arrays

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 562-569

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.9b02249

关键词

oxygen evolution reaction; cobalt oxyhydroxide; electrochemical diffusion; layered structure; density functional theory

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean Government (MSIT) [NRF-2015R1A5A1037627, NRF-2017R1E1A1A03071049]
  2. Welch Foundation [F-1841]
  3. Texas Advanced Computing Center
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017R1E1A1A03071049] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Layered cobalt (oxy)hydroxides have received much attention as cost-effective and efficient catalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) for electrochemical water splitting. Doping with guest cations possessing different oxidation states such as Ag can change the chemistry of conventional transition metal oxides and hydroxides, generating unexpected electrocatalytic performances. However, Ag dopants have been found to easily segregate at the surface of electrocatalysts, which induces deactivation. Here, we fabricated Ag-doped CoOOH nanosheet arrays using electrochemical deposition, followed by a simple electrochemical diffusion approach. Surprisingly, we revealed, through atom probe tomography (APT), secondary ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS), and energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) that Ag atoms are homogeneously distributed without any detectable segregation. The Ag-doped CoOOH exhibits enhanced OER performance in terms of overpotential, both experimentally (256 mV) and theoretically (60 mV). The homogeneously distributed Ag dopants facilitate the phase transformation from Co(OH)(2) to the active phase of CoOOH. Calculations show that Ag doping enhances phase stability of CoOOH and exposed Ag dopants act as active sites by releasing -OH adsorbates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据