4.8 Article

A van der Waals antiferromagnetic topological insulator with weak interlayer magnetic coupling

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13814-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences (BES) [DE-SC0011978, DE-SC0017862]
  2. U.S. National Science Foundation-Division of Material Research [NSF-DMR-1534734]
  3. NSFC [11874195]
  4. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Computational Science and Material Design [2019B030301001]
  5. Climbing Program Special Funds [pdjhb0448]
  6. Center for Computational Science and Engineering of SUSTech
  7. U.S. DOE BES Early Career Award [KC0402010, DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  8. DOE Office of Science User Facility [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  9. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0011978] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnetic topological insulators (TI) provide an important material platform to explore quantum phenomena such as quantized anomalous Hall effect and Majorana modes, etc. Their successful material realization is thus essential for our fundamental understanding and potential technical revolutions. By realizing a bulk van der Waals material MnBi4Te7 with alternating septuple [MnBi2Te4] and quintuple [Bi2Te3] layers, we show that it is ferromagnetic in plane but antiferromagnetic along the c axis with an out-of-plane saturation field of similar to 0.22T at 2 K. Our angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy measurements and first-principles calculations further demonstrate that MnBi4Te7 is a Z(2) antiferromagnetic TI with two types of surface states associated with the [MnBi2Te4] or [Bi2Te3] termination, respectively. Additionally, its superlattice nature may make various heterostructures of [MnBi2Te4] and [Bi2Te3] layers possible by exfoliation. Therefore, the low saturation field and the superlattice nature of MnBi4Te7 make it an ideal system to investigate rich emergent phenomena.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据