4.8 Article

Open access resource for cellular-resolution analyses of corticocortical connectivity in the marmoset monkey

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-14858-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [DP110101200, DP140101968, CE140100007]
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council [APP1003906, APP1020839, APP1083152, APP1082144, APP1122220]
  3. International Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility (INCF Seed Funding grant scheme)
  4. European Regional Development Fund under the Operational Program Innovative Economy [POIG.02.03.00-00-003/09]
  5. National Centre for Research and Development [ERA-NET-NEURON/17/2017]
  6. National Institute of Mental Health [R01MH062349]
  7. Office of Naval Research [N00014-17-1-2041]
  8. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
  9. Mathers Foundation
  10. Indian Institute of Technology Madras

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the principles of neuronal connectivity requires tools for efficient quantification and visualization of large datasets. The primate cortex is particularly challenging due to its complex mosaic of areas, which in many cases lack clear boundaries. Here, we introduce a resource that allows exploration of results of 143 retrograde tracer injections in the marmoset neocortex. Data obtained in different animals are registered to a common stereotaxic space using an algorithm guided by expert delineation of histological borders, allowing accurate assignment of connections to areas despite interindividual variability. The resource incorporates tools for analyses relative to cytoarchitectural areas, including statistical properties such as the fraction of labeled neurons and the percentage of supragranular neurons. It also provides purely spatial (parcellation-free) data, based on the stereotaxic coordinates of 2 million labeled neurons. This resource helps bridge the gap between high-density cellular connectivity studies in rodents and imaging-based analyses of human brains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据