4.8 Article

The C. difficile toxin B membrane translocation machinery is an evolutionarily conserved protein delivery apparatus

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-14306-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [RGPIN-2017-06817]
  2. CIHR
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Scholarship of Canada Graduate Scholarship-Doctoral
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [RGPIN-2019-04266]
  5. Ontario Early Researcher Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Large Clostridial Toxins (LCTs) are a family of six homologous protein toxins that are implicated in severe disease. LCTs infiltrate host cells using a translocation domain (LCT-T) that contains both cell-surface receptor binding sites and a membrane translocation apparatus. Despite much effort, LCT translocation remains poorly understood. Here we report the identification of 1104 LCT-T homologs, with 769 proteins from bacteria outside of clostridia. Sequences are widely distributed in pathogenic and host-associated species, in a variety of contexts and architectures. Consistent with these homologs being functional toxins, we show that a distant LCT-T homolog from Serratia marcescens acts as a pH-dependent translocase to deliver its effector into host cells. Based on evolutionary footprinting of LCT-T homologs, we further define an evolutionarily conserved translocase region that we show is an autonomous translocase capable of delivering heterologous cargo into host cells. Our work uncovers a broad class of translocating toxins and provides insights into LCT translocation. Large Clostridial toxins infiltrate host cells using a translocation domain (LCT-T). Here, using a genomics-driven approach and functional assays, the authors uncover the presence of distant LCT-T homologs in bacteria outside clostridia and provide evidence for a toxic effector function in the gammaproteobacterium Serratia marcescens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据