4.8 Article

SUMOylation inhibitors synergize with FXR agonists in combating liver fibrosis

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-14138-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81930109, 81430091, 81720108032, 81421005, 91429308, 81530098, 81603194]
  2. Project for Major New Drug Innovation and Development [2015ZX09501010, 2018ZX09711001-002-003, 2018ZX09711002-001-004]
  3. Overseas Expertise Introduction Project for Discipline Innovation [G20582017001]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M600455, 2017T100423]
  5. State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines at China Pharmaceutical University [SKLNMZZCX201817, SKLNMZZCX201801]
  6. Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen [SZSM201801060]
  7. Double-First Class Initiative Project [CPU2018GF09, CPU2018GF01]
  8. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [ZIABC005562] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) is a promising target for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and fibrosis. Although various FXR agonists have shown anti-fibrotic effects in diverse preclinical animal models, the response rate and efficacies in clinical trials were not optimum. Here we report that prophylactic but not therapeutic administration of obeticholic acid (OCA) prevents hepatic stellate cell (HSC) activation and fibrogenesis. Activated HSCs show limited response to OCA and other FXR agonists due to enhanced FXR SUMOylation. SUMOylation inhibitors rescue FXR signaling and thereby increasing the efficacy of OCA against HSC activation and fibrosis. FXR upregulates Perilipin-1, a direct target gene of FXR, to stabilize lipid droplets and thereby prevent HSC activation. Therapeutic coadministration of OCA and SUMOylation inhibitors drastically impedes liver fibrosis induced by CCl4, bile duct ligation, and more importantly NASH. In conclusion, we propose a promising therapeutic approach by combining SUMOylation inhibitors and FXR agonists for liver fibrosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据