4.4 Article

Hydroxysafflor yellow A induces autophagy in human liver cancer cells by regulating Beclin 1 and ERK expression

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE
卷 19, 期 4, 页码 2989-2996

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/etm.2020.8552

关键词

hydroxysafflor yellow A; autophagy; light chain 3; Beclin 1; electron microscopy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31500640, 30572436, 31800652]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydroxysafflor yellow A (HSYA) is a water-soluble component of the safflower (Carthamus tinctorius), and research has revealed that HSYA exhibits antitumor effects. In the present study, the effects of HSYA on the autophagy of a Hep-G2 liver cancer cell line, as well as the underlying mechanisms, were investigated. Hep-G2 cells were treated with HSYA and the viability of cells was measured using an MTT assay. Western blotting and immunofluorescence assays were performed to determine the expression of light chain 3 II (LC3-II) and p62, as well as the autophagy regulators Beclin 1 and ERK1/2. Transmission electron microscopy was performed to observe the formation of autophagosomes. The combined effects of HSYA and the autophagy inhibitor chloroquine (CQ) were also determined. The results revealed that the viability of Hep-G2 cells decreased with increasing concentrations of HSYA. Furthermore, LC3-II expression increased significantly and the level of p62 decreased significantly in the HYSA group compared with the control group. Additionally, an increase in Beclin 1 expression and a decrease in phosphorylated-ERK1/2 expression was observed in Hep-G2 cells treated with HYSA. Following treatment with CQ and HSYA, a significant increase in the viability of Hep-G2 cells was observed compared with the HSYA group. Collectively, the results indicated that HSYA induced autophagy by promoting the expression of Beclin 1 and inhibiting the phosphorylation of ERK in liver cancer cells. Therefore, HSYA may serve as a potential therapeutic agent for liver cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据