4.3 Article

Functional versus functional and anatomical criteria-guided ranibizumab treatment in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration - results from the randomized, phase IIIb OCTAVE study

期刊

BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12886-019-1251-6

关键词

Best-corrected visual acuity; Neovascular age-related macular degeneration; Optical coherence tomography; Ranibizumab; Retreatment criteria

资金

  1. Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background To evaluate the efficacy and safety of two individualized ranibizumab retreatment schemes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Methods Patients (N = 671) were randomized (1:1) to receive three initial monthly ranibizumab 0.5 mg injections, then retreatment guided by either best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) loss (Group I) or BCVA loss and/or signs of disease activity on optical coherence tomography (OCT; Group II). The study was terminated prematurely and the decision to discontinue the study was made by the sponsor. Efficacy analyses were performed on patients who completed 12 months of the originally planned 24-month study. Safety analyses are presented for all safety analyzable patients. Results Of 671 randomized patients, 305 completed 12 months of the study. For the 12-month completers, baseline mean (standard deviation) BCVA and reading-center evaluated central subfield thickness (CSFT) were comparable [Group I: 60.9 (13.10) letters and 517.7(201.79) mu m; Group II: 60.2 (12.21) letters and 515.3 (198.37) mu m]. The change from baseline at Month 12 in BCVA was 6.7 (13.48) letters in Group I and 8.3 (13.53) letters in Group II and the change in CSFT was - 161.3 (163.48) mu m and - 175.3 (170.45) mu m, respectively. The mean number of ranibizumab injections was 8.2 in Group I and 8.4 in Group II. Conclusion Ranibizumab treatment resulted in visual and anatomic gains at 12 months for both retreatment strategies, with a trend in favor of OCT-guided vs BCVA loss guided retreatment. No new safety signals were seen.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据