4.7 Article

Extensive protein S-nitrosylation associated with human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma pathogenesis

期刊

CELL DEATH & DISEASE
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41419-019-2144-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81600502, 31571241, 31660266]
  2. Clinical Guidance Project of Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Department [2017SK50502]
  3. Young Doctor Training Program of Hunan Provincial People's Hospital [BSJJ201801]
  4. Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine [A1-AFD018181Z3943]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

NO (nitric oxide)-mediated protein S-nitrosylation has been established as one major signaling mechanism underlying cancer initiation and development, but its roles in PDAC (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma) pathogenesis still remain largely unexplored. In this study, we identified 585 unique S-nitrosylation sites among 434 proteins in PDAC patients and PANC-1 cell line by a site-specific proteomics. Larger number of S-nitrosylated proteins were identified in PDAC tissues and PANC-1 cells than adjacent non-cancerous tissues. These S-nitrosylated proteins are significantly enriched in a multitude of biological processes associated with tumorigenesis, including carbohydrate metabolism, cytoskeleton regulation, cell cycle, focal adhesion, adherent junctions, and cell migration. Components of the pancreatic cancer pathway were extensively S-nitrosylated, such as v-raf-1 murine leukemia viral oncogene homolog 1 (Raf-1) and Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3). Moreover, NOS (NO synthase) inhibitor significantly repressed STAT3 S-nitrosylation in PANC-1 cells, which caused significant increase of STAT3 phosphorylation and PANC-1 cell viability, suggesting important roles of protein S-nitrosylation in PDAC development. These results revealed extensive protein S-nitrosylation associated with PDAC pathogenesis, which provided a basis for protein modification-based cancer diagnosis and targeted therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据