期刊
CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY
卷 42, 期 -, 页码 1-6出版社
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2019.10.003
关键词
-
资金
- National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC)
- National Science Foundation [DBI-1639145, NA100AR4310213]
Environmental knowledge is a crucial input for public and private decision-making, yet often useful environmental knowledge appears to be unusable for decision-makers. To better understand how usable knowledge can be produced, we need to build on a better understanding of decision-making processes. We distinguish three different logics of decision-making and discuss their implications for knowledge use: (1) the logic of consequentiality, rooted in theories of rational choice, in which environmental knowledge is used because of its utilitarian value; (2) the logic of appropriateness, rooted in institutional theories, in which environmental knowledge is used because it fits existing rules and routines; and (3) the logic of meaningfulness, rooted in theories of sensemaking and interpretation, in which environmental knowledge is used because it makes sense to decision-makers. The theory and practice of environmental knowledge (co-)production can profit from considering these different logics of decision-making.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据